If you're getting rad but no one sees you, are you really getting rad? |
But enough diddling around. This
blog is primarily about skiing once every month of the year, but when the
spirit takes me, it’ll address some key aspects of skiing. This one tackles the
age-old question of determining just how rad one gets on the mountain.
Ski long enough — hell, even hang
out long enough in a bar near the ski hill — you’ll hear some conversation like
this: “Then I hit this like 40 foot cliff with a pretty gnarly run out” or “nah
man, we skied that peak outside the boundary, there were cracks shooting out
from our skis on the way down, pretty wild!” It’s a little part of the culture of one-upmanship
that can spread throughout a ski town. At Seneca we think it’s pretty funny, though
it’s also fringed with a bit of sadness because it can lead people into bad
spots they might not be able to get out of.
After making an Ego Claim (+500 GNAR points) the "best skier on the mountain" makes his way off toward an Extreme Brag (+1,000 GNAR points) |
For the uninitiated, it stands for
Gaffney’s Numerical Assessment of Radness. The system offers points for skiing tough
lines and doing assorted rad things while skiing them. Points are accumulated
over an entire season. An end of season tally determines who won the game of
G.N.A.R. for that ski season. The game is an easy-to-follow way to resolve
issues of radness over the course of a given season.
We decided the question needed addressing
once more, given all this crazy technology that’s come out since McConkey, the
God Among Skiers, created his game. And because it’s always a good time to poke
fun at that hardcore culture. Let’s
get down to brass tacks.
G.N.A.R. is mostly for those who
want to “just have fun” and “end the day satisfied with skiing no matter the
conditions” and stuff like that. Save those platitudes for Sunday, bro. That
kind of thing isn’t going to fly in a truly hardcore ski town. This entirely
serious debate can only properly be solved by science, which boils down to hard
numbers. Preferably ones that are already added up for you, thanks to
technology.
My high school skiing friends and I
did a little investigating into this during our annual ski trip this past March.
We were, appropriately, in Squaw Valley and had recently come across a fine
smartphone app called Ski Tracks that tallies up speed, total vertical,
steepest slope angle and the number of runs completed in a given day, among
other things.
It was incredibly important to get
as rad as we possibly could on the first day, so we went out there and did work
despite fairly terrible spring snow conditions. Our max speed was 61.8 mph; we
covered nearly 18,000 vertical feet and more than 16 miles on 11 runs, the
steepest of which was 42 degrees, despite the non-rad task of getting passes
and such limiting us to a paltry five hours of skiing. Radness quantified!
Of course it was just a scientific
one-day test run. None of this actually solved anything. Maybe next year’s ski
trip will involve some sort of quantifiable radness competition, complete with
a championship belt.
No comments:
Post a Comment